10 Business-Based Immigration Updates Expected In 2018
In April 2017, President Trump issued the Buy American, Hire
American Executive Order. United States Citizenship and Immigration
Services (USCIS) has carried out and is considering a number of
policy and regulatory changes to fulfill the President’s
“Buy American, Hire American” executive order, including
conducting a “thorough review” of employment-based visa
programs. Further, there are several bills being considered in the
House and Senate pertaining to immigration. The following items are
immigration changes being discussed for 2018:
- Possible Cancellation of H-4EADs
There is both a pending court case and a proposed rule to
eliminate the 2015 rule which granted H-4 Employment Authorization
Documents (EADs) to certain H-4 dependent spouses seeking
employment-based lawful permanent resident (LPR) status.
‘Save Jobs USA’ filed a law suit which was initially
dismissed in 2016. Subsequently, ‘Save Jobs USA’ filed an
appeal claiming the rule has no protections for U.S. workers and
increases the pool of workers looking for jobs and the U.S.
Department of Homeland Security (DHS) never had the authority to
grant EADs to H-4 visa holders.
Further, DHS is reviewing the 2015 rule which extended
employment authorization to certain H-4 dependent spouses. This
follows the issuance of Executive Order 13788, Buy American and
Hire American. The rule is proposing to remove H-4 employment
authorization. A rule addressing this issue may be published in
February 2018.
- H-1B Cap Lottery and EmployerRegistration
DHS is considering a rule that would require H-1B employers to
pre-register for the H-1B cap lottery and only those employers that
have won a cap number would be allowed to file an H-1B cap
petition. DHS may also propose a rule to impose a priority system,
which would give preference to the most highly educated and/or
highly paid H-1B workers. Rules addressing these issues
may be published in February 2018. Changes to government
regulations are subject to the rule making process, which usually
takes several months to complete and involves a notice and comment
period for the public. As such, it is anticipated that any proposed
rules would not complete the rule making process before April 1,
2018, the start of the filing period for the 2018 H-1B cap
season. However, it is not clear, if some proposed changes
could be implemented prior. Further, a preference system that
requires pre-certification for the lottery would likely require
legislative action. Some bills are proposing this (including one
proposed by Congresswoman Zoe Lofgren) but this would not likely
move in Congress.
- Changes to OPT
DHS is considering imposing a rule that would increase the
oversight of students on Optional Practical Training (OPT), and
impose additional obligations on the part of the U.S. employers who
employ F-1 students during their OPT period. It is anticipated that
a rule addressing this issue may be published in October 2018.
Additionally, the Trump administration is considering
eliminating the regulation on STEM OPT. The Obama administration
finalized a rule extending the work period for international
students in STEM fields by two years, for a total of three years of
work experience. The Trump administration may rescind this
additional two year period.
- Potential FeeIncrease
DHS is considering a rule to increase USCIS filing fees for
various petitions and applications. DHS indicated the rule
may be published in October 2018. Additionally, civil monetary
fines have been adjusted for inflation for H-1B program violations
effective January 2, 2018.
- Changes in Definitions andAdjudications for H-1B Petitions and Revised LCA
DHS is in the process of promulgating a rule that would revise
the definition of the term “specialty occupation” in
connection with the H-1B program. The rule also proposes to revise
the definition of the terms “employment” and
“employer-employee relationship.” It is anticipated
that a rule addressing this issue may be published in October
2018.
USCIS has already been amending their policy on what qualified
as a Specialty Occupation. In March 2017, USCIS released a policy
memo impacting adjudication of petitions listing a level 1 wage.
Companies are receiving numerous Requests for Evidence (RFEs)
addressing issues including:
- USCIS asserting duties indicate theposition is beyond entry level and LCA doesn’t correspond with
position.
- USCIS claiming Level 1 is not aspecialty occupation.
USCIS announced that the number of RFEs issued between January
2017 and August 2017 had increased by 44 percent from the previous
year. The USCIS memo also stated that the U.S. Department of
Labor’s (DOL) Occupational Outlook Handbook (OOH), alone (which
has been used to determine if the petitioner’s position and
positions like it generally require a bachelor’s degree or
equivalent), will not be enough to prove the position is a
“specialty occupation” and USCIS may look more at the
proposed job duties when determining the complexity to determine
whether the position is a specialty occupation. In 2018, we can
anticipate even greater inspection of job descriptions and the
specialty occupation standard.
- Increased Site Visits andIncreased Scrutiny by CBP
FDNS Site Visits
Following the Executive Order Buy American, Hire American, there
has been an increase in the number of USCIS site visits. The USCIS
Administrative Site Visit and Verification Program has Fraud
Detection and National Security (FDNS) officers make unannounced
visits to collect information as part of a compliance review. Going
forward, USCIS is planning a more targeted approach to site visits
focusing on:
- Cases where USCIS cannot validate theemployer’s basic business information through commercially
available data;
- H-1B-dependent employers (those whohave a high ratio of H-1B workers as compared to U.S. workers, as
defined by statute); and
- Employers petitioning for H-1Bworkers who work off-site at another company or organization’s
location.
ICE Site Visits
In an October 2017 speech, Immigration and Customs Enforcement
(ICE) acting director Thomas Homan confirmed his plans to follow
the President’s orders increase enforcement to prevent fraud
and abuse. ICE has already increased inspections and worksite
operations, and going forward ICE indicated the agency will:
- Boost the number of inspections inthe upcoming fiscal year;
- Multiply time spent on enforcement byfour or five times;
- Target undocumented employees fordetention and removal; and
- Prosecute employers for knowinglyhiring or retaining workers who lack valid U.S. employment
authorization.
DOL Investigations
In June 2017, the U.S. Department of Labor (DOL) announced plans
to more aggressively confront entities committing visa program
fraud and abuse. The DOL Secretary directed the Wage and Hour
Division to conduct additional civil investigations, instructed the
Employment and Training Administration (ETA) to propose changes to
the LCA, and told the ETA to coordinate the administration and
enforcement of visa programs to refer criminal fraud to the Office
of the Inspector General. The DOL will continue to work with the
DOJ and DHS to further investigate and detect visa program fraud
and abuse.
CBP Inspection
In addition to site visits for those workers in the United
States, Customs and Border Patrol (CBP) Officers are imposing
greater levels of scrutiny for those individuals seeking entry to
the U.S. Following the Buy American/ Hire American Executive Order,
The Foreign Affairs Manual (FAM) was updated for H, L, and O visas
so officers should take the executive order into consideration when
they review how visas are adjudicated at consulates abroad. The FAM
and associated Handbooks (FAHs) are an authoritative source for the
Department of State’s (DOS) procedures that govern the
operations of the State Department, the Foreign Service and other
federal agencies.
It is crucial that employers are prepared for greater scrutiny
of employment sites and immigration forms by auditing their public
access files and having accurate I-9 records.
- Re-adjudication of ExtensionPetitions
USCIS issued a memo in 2004 which directed adjudicators when
adjudicating petition extensions involving the same parties and
underlying facts as the initial petition to defer to the prior
determination. An October 2017 memo rescinded the former USCIS
policy and stated that adjudicators must review the petition and
supporting evidence to determine whether the petition may be
approved. USCIS also indicated that they may still request
additional evidence in extension cases. Employers should be
prepared for greater scrutiny over extension petitions in 2018.
- I-485Interviews
October 2017, USCIS started expanding in-person interviews for
employment-based Adjustment of Status applications. Previously,
applicants in these categories did not require an in-person
interview with USCIS officers in order for their application for
permanent residency to be adjudicated. Beyond these categories,
USCIS is planning an incremental expansion of interviews to other
benefit types. This new requirement may increase processing times
for these petitions. In our office’s experience, the interview
process appears to be going smoothly for employment-based
applicants.
- “Travel Ban”Update
December 2017, the U.S. Supreme Court issued orders which
allowed the Presidential Proclamation from September 2017 to be
implemented imposing country-specific travel restrictions on
individuals from 8 countries: Chad, Iran, Libya, North Korea,
Somalia, Syria, Venezuela, and Yemen. Some countries have specific
visas which are suspended while for other countries all immigrant
and nonimmigrant entry is suspended. A case-by-case waiver is
available if foreign national can show that being denied entry
would cause undue hardship to the individual, their entry would not
pose a threat to U.S. national security, and that their entry
“would be in the national interest.” Procedurally, cases
will continue to be reviewed and scheduled for visa interviews. The
officer will determine whether the applicant is affected by the
proclamation and, if so, whether the case qualifies for an
exception or may qualify for a waiver. No separate application for
a waiver.
- Re-NegotiatingNAFTA
The U.S., Mexico, and Canada are currently renegotiating the
North American Free Trade Agreement (NAFTA). Businesses and
individuals are concerned that the entire NAFTA professional visa
category (TN Visa) might be eliminated during NAFTA renegotiations.
Movement of professionals was one of the key demands Canada listed
before NAFTA negotiations commenced in August 2017. The U.S., which
could terminate NAFTA, has not addressed labor mobility in the
first rounds of negotiations. Canada also would like the list of
NAFTA occupations to be expanded. In contrast, in November 2017,
USCIS issued a policy memo clarifying the types of duties
permissible under the TN visa category for Economists. It is
possible the Trump Administration may look at restricting other TN
categories in the future.
The content of this article is intended to provide a general
guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought
about your specific circumstances.